There were 12 participants in the session. Mr. Jatta explained the six co-financing issues in the meeting which are underlined in the 2010 Portfolio Report. The participants were then divided into two groups. Each group worked with two challenges - 1 & 2 and 3 & 4 (indicated below):
- Different requirements and processing schedule of donors
- Mobilizing private companies as co-investors
- Firm co-financing commitments difficult to obtain leading to unilateral withdrawals during implementation
- How to overcome self-interest considerations from partner co-financers and replace with common interest?
Issue # 1:
- Different roles and regulations posses problems for the project management
- Project should choose the most stringent request for implementation
- Donors to harmonize their requirements and expected complementarities
- Donors to see the project as ONE project and have joint missions
- Government to take leadership roles in getting donor together
Issue # 2:
- Size of investment unattractive for private companies to invest that calls for innovation and sharing of technology
- Effective implementation of the different private investors' contribution ensuring good governance, harmonization, transparency and accountability
- Bureaucracy of utilization of the funds (from donor and governmentt)
- Lack of recognition of private-investors contribution in meeting social responsibilities
- Private sector is profit oriented and must see profit first
- Risk of loosing publicity
- Challenge for project to mainstream government's and private investment at planning
- Lack of clarity on partnership and co-financing
- Difficulty in defining the boarderline when dealing with the private sector
- Insufficient design time to understand local condition especially from private companies
Issue # 3:
- Involve everyone in project since the starting to ensure that everyone is aware of what the project is all about and what its vision is
- Make IFAD fund available to all components to minimize delays and facilitate re-allocation later
- Forge an MoU among all partners emphasizing the responsibility of each and ensure commitment to co-financing
- Compare parallel vs. joint financing (case specific) – considering the advantages and disadvantages
- Involvement of co-financier on the Supervision and Implementation Support Missions/show impact
- Provision of mid-term correction in the MoU
- Give co-financer the option to choose the component which is close to their investment policy
Issue #4
- Harmonize project implementation procedures, staff terms and conditions of employment – harmonization must be clarified in the design stage and include MoU: e.g., one implementation manual; project manager and staffing structure unified
- Open dialogue – Open communication to both partners emphasizing on the overall achievements of the programme
- Follow only one system in the project implementation so as not to hamper/delay project
- Equal responsibility and accountability between the financers
- Developing partnership strategies /modalities based on local context where it is implemented
This session was documented by Social Reporter Bashu Aryal.
0 comments:
Post a Comment